At Home with Tech

Unlock the power of all your technology and learn how to master your photography, computers and smartphone.

I Found these Silent Truths from My Father’s Old Home Movies

There’s that movie scene from “Iron Man 2,” where Tony Stark reviews old film outtakes of his deceased father Howard Stark. The raw film clips show Howard making a promotional film decades earlier. First, Howard is annoyed by child Tony, who plays in the background and ruins the scene. There’s no fatherly love expressed here.

But at the back end of the reel, Howard unexpectedly turns to the camera and seemingly breaks through time, talking directly to future Tony. Howard shares his love for his son, knowing at some point, Tony would receive his heartfelt message at the moment Tony needed it most.

On the one hand, this all seems a bit contrived, though not entirely implausible. But the scene really spoke to me. I’ve watched it many times. I’m drawn to it. And now, I finally understand why.

My Father was a Filmmaker
I’ve just finished converting my father’s old 8mm family movies to digital files. He began shooting them before I was born and then continued throughout my early years. 

But he gradually stopped his hobby, focusing more on his photography. My dad’s old film reels simply sat in a white box forgotten in the back of my family’s hallway closet. 

My mother and grandfather with me on my first birthday

These films reappeared many years later when I was an adult visiting my parents for the holidays. My father felt inspired to set up his aging movie projector for me and my mom, and he ran some of these old 8mm films for us. It was remarkable to watch them for the first time. 

My parents on their honeymoon

I brought along my camcorder, and I recorded his presentation displayed on a pull-up screen that he had also lugged along with his projector out of the closet. But we didn’t get through all the films. More than half remained unwatched. 

Fast forward a few more decades, and that white box of family memories eventually found its way to my house. (My father passed away in 2022.) 

Rescuing Our Family Films 
A few months back, I decided it was finally time to try to properly convert all these time capsules, which had deteriorated somewhat, but were still viewable.

So, I purchased a Kodak REELS Film Digitizer for the job, which was a far cry from a professional film conversion plan. 

But the film-to-digital converter worked well enough to bring these silent moments back to life. And the quality was fine for my needs.

The conversion process was wicked slow, and I also found much of the content not worth saving. On the other hand, certain reels contained priceless moments of my parents and my paternal grandfather. And of course, I had to go through what seemed like miles of film to find them.

And then I stumbled upon one huge surprise buried in a strangely unlabeled reel. It was the day my parents’ families first met at my maternal grandparents’ house. It was shot like an old news reel covering some massive public event.
(Of course, this was a big event for the two families.) 

After I first watched it, it felt like I had jumped through a time portal to witness history. It’s a true gem. And now I’ve got it properly archived.

A Baby Surrounded by History
I also converted numerous clips of young Barrett, from baby and toddler to little kid. Sure, I was cute, but I think the greater value in these scenes comes from looking at everything around me- the people, the styles and the environment. Here’s my grandfather with me and my mother on a sunny 20th century afternoon in New York City’s Central Park.

A summer day in Central Park

This is such a cool moment from another era. 

Was the Payoff Worth the Grind?
I mentioned the digital conversion process takes time. Yes, lots of time! 

Each 3-minute reel took me 33 minutes or so to convert, as the digitizer snaps a photo of each frame and then stitches it all together into an MP4 file on an SD card (slick but slow). And I also had some larger reels to deal with… those took hours!

And it’s also not a ‘set it and forget it’ process. You can’t totally walk away. That’s because the film can easily jam in the converter. It’s not so much the unit’s fault. It has more to do with the condition of your film and quality of the splices. Any aberration, and the converter will jam. So, I needed to stay in the room to be able to see what was going on.

Plus, I found on several occasions that the film had broken mid-reel. This happened at some point decades back, and my father had never rejoined the pieces. Rather, he simply wrapped the rest of the film on top of the reel, leaving this booby trap for the future to figure out.

Give the Job to the Pros?
You might say that my experience clearly points to the value of simply shipping your box of misbehaving film reels to a company to do the work for you. They’ll deal with the mess and create better-quality conversions. And think about all the time you’ll save.

The only big downside is accepting that you’ll also be paying to convert footage that you otherwise wouldn’t want to save. Plus, depending on the number of reels you’re converting, it eventually becomes more cost effective to do it yourself.

There’s no right answer here. It’s whatever makes more sense for you.

Silent Truths and Manufactured Moments
I don’t think my father ever considered that I would attempt this project. Our family history is sufficiently documented in photos. I imagine as far as he was concerned, these films were simply his own hobby for him to enjoy during those years. Nothing more.

But of course, I was searching for something more. I wanted to understand more about my past.

As I reviewed the converted films, I looked for glimpses of certain ‘truths.’ I thought people in motion would reveal more than a posed photo. But I quickly realized there was plenty of posing going on here as well.In many of the scenes, my family acted like movie stars in front of the camera, exaggerating their movements and constantly smiling. 

My parents enjoying their vacation

Those mannerisms may also have to do with the silent movie nature of 8mm film. 
Without audio on these 8mm film reels, of course my father couldn’t talk to me. So, I never got my Tony Stark moment.

First Steps
But watching my parents interact during their early years together helped me fill out this optimistic first chapter in my own mind. Every story has a beginning, and I was watching theirs, however manufactured.

I got to see a bit more of my paternal grandfather. I have fond memories of him, and it was nice to see Grandpa in action again. 

My grandfather walking down Madison Avenue

There was also a lot of footage of my mother, who loved the camera in those early days. She was my foundation as I grew up, and the film clips of us together warmly displayed those beginnings. 

My mom and me dancing by the pool during a vacation

I can’t believe she’s been gone for twenty years. I’m so happy I now have these additional recorded moments of her.

But this project eventually leads me back to my father.

Look, we had a complicated relationship. Suffice to say, my father was a master storyteller, and I spent a lot of my adult life with him trying to figure out any number of little truths… and some bigger ones.

No, these old films didn’t answer any of them. But they did provide a bright view of my family’s life at the beginning. And I’d say that’s a real gift.

So, thank you, Dad. You were a pretty good filmmaker.

“I Built This for You”
My 8mm family film conversion project is complete. No, my father never sent me a secret message like Howard Stark to fundamentally change my understanding of my past. But he did show me some things, and he captured a few priceless family moments along the way. There are even a few scenes of my father with boy Barrett having fun.

My dad and me spending some quality time together

These clips are important reminders, as memories have a way of blurring the past. So, mission accomplished.

My cinematic journey back in time has wrapped. And now it’s time to move on. 

The present and future beckon.

How Real Is This AI Video If I Created It Using My Own Photos?

Technology has chipped away at the definition of reality. Digital photography and photo editing software provide almost endless adjustment opportunities for creative expression. But now, with AI-powered tools, you can literally reconstruct an entire photo. You can remove distractions and even people. So, what’s real anymore?

For the past few years, I’ve been fighting a certain sense of guilt as I’ve learned to ‘improve’ my photography using AI-fueled enhancements. Sure, my resulting photos are better, but I sometimes worry that they’re no longer the pictures I captured. But I’ve been careful, and I’ve worked hard to keep it real.

Today, I happily use all the AI-powered photo editing tools in Adobe Lightroom, because I make sure my modified pictures are still faithful to the core images. This is essence of my rule book, and I follow it without angst. 

Next comes video.

AI Can Turn Your Photo into a Video
Text-to-video prompting and photo-to-video magic is today’s big creative disruptor. And I know I must face this revolution head on, as it changes everything about the work I’ve been doing for decades.

I’m particularly interested in the generative AI power to to turn a real photo into a video that looks shockingly similar. AI can replicate and then extend the creative elements in your photos into full motion video. Remarkable. (The results are not always perfect, but they’re improving.)

So, I embarked on a little creative exercise. I chose a few silhouette photos I snapped during a sunrise over Delray Beach on our recent Florida vacation and ran them through Google Veo. This process generated 8-second video clips that almost exactly followed the visual elements from my photos. The only exception was Veo created alternate, though similar, people on the beach. (And that’s fine.)

Then I edited the AI video clips together to create this sequence representing my own sunrise experience on that beach.

AI Video Generated from My Photos

As Real as Art Can Be
So, what exactly is this? What have I created here? Well, it’s simultaneously real and not real.

My photos provided enough creative direction for Veo to effectively clone each photo and then extend each moment.

So sure, then it’s easy to call this sequence ‘fake’ as Veo has invented 8 seconds from each frame I gave it.

But these individual scenes faithfully reflect the reality I saw.  They do express the essence of my experience.

So perhaps this entire AI-enabled creative process should fall under the category of art. Yes, maybe that’s what I’m doing here.

No Professional Video Crew Required
I also found it wildly fun that I’m able to generate video clips that would otherwise require me to hire a professional video crew for the day.

In my AI video, the opening shot of the two people walking on the beach… yes, I might be able to capture that with my DJI Osmo 3 gimbal. 

But that closing tracking shot of the paddleboard man surfing? That’s a clear step beyond Barrett’s personal filmmaking chops (for now).

The Limits When Recording Real B-Roll
Of course, I don’t need AI to create video for me. Here’s some actual b-roll I recorded on Delray Beach that same morning with my Osmo.

Real Barrett B-Roll

But while I also like this ‘real’ b-roll, these are necessarily wider shots, limited by the realities I encountered in those moments on the beach. (Shooting b-roll can be an intrusive process. And I didn’t want to mess with people’s sunrise Zen.)

Snapping a photo is quick and usually less invasive. As a result, I think my original silhouette shots had additional visual impact.

Real Barrett Photos

But now, I can also use my new AI tools to express my creative interpretation of these same images into longer scenes. I can build on these moments, magically extending my stills into the video realm. That’s so cool!

But what does this all mean moving forward? Well, I’m not exactly sure. 

A Digital Painting in Motion
I don’t truly understand my little Frankenstein video. Yes, I made it, but what is it? 

  • It’s alive… and yet not 
  • Fabricated, but very close to reality
  • Hard to exactly define, other than an artist’s interpretation

Perhaps I’ll simply call it my digital painting in motion. 

Of course, there are any number of unanswered questions regarding the broader topic of AI-generated video for our society. But I’ll leave that for another day.

For now, I’m pleased that I was able to simply share with you the flow and true ‘spirit’ of my beautiful sunrise experience with a little artistic help from AI. 

And I hope you liked the paintbrush I chose to use.

Why I Haven’t Immediately Given “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” a Failing Grade

I can’t think of another moment in “Star Trek” history with such low expectations about an upcoming series as with “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy.” Perhaps because nobody asked for this. I was certainly not interested in the stories of a few unknown cadets roughing it during their first semester at Starfleet Academy. There are so many other seemingly better directions to go with “Star Trek.”

But the state of Trek these days is complicated. 

  • “Discovery” – cancelled
  • “Lower Decks” – cancelled
  • “Prodigy” – cancelled
  • “Strange New Worlds” – to be cancelled after its fifth season
  • The fourth Kelvin timeline movie that we’ve been patiently waiting for over the past decade – cancelled

For many, including me, the obvious next step would have been to greenlight a spinoff series from “Star Trek: Picard.” It was perfectly set up in the last scene with Seven of Nine as the captain of the rechristened Enterprise-G. 

The great cast was already in place with Jeri Ryan front and center. There was even a name: “Star Trek: Legacy.”

But no.

The State of Kurtzman Trek
Alex Kurtzman has been at the helm of these newer series on Paramount+, and while I’m pleased that “Star Trek” returned to television with an explosion of content over these past nine years, that streaming spigot has now clearly been severely restricted.

Of course, it’s all about money. (Isn’t it always?)

So where is “Star Trek” going? Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future. 
(Sorry…. mixing up my sci-fi references.)

But first, let’s kick the tires on “Starfleet Academy,” now that the first two episodes have finally dropped. 

Registration is Open
As the title suggests, this series follows several young cadets and their adventures at Starfleet Academy. It’s during the same timeline as the later “Discovery” seasons after that ship jumped a whopping 900 years forward. These are the years when a fractured Federation is still rebuilding after “the Burn.” And this is the first Starfleet Academy class to be assembled in over a century.

Our main cadet character is Caleb Mir, played by Sandro Rosta. In the show’s first scene, we see that when he was a child, he is unfairly separated from his mother by the Federation. He’s been on the run ever since, searching for her.

Our new captain is Nahla Ake, played by Holly Hunter. She’s half-Lanthanite, giving her a life span of some hundreds of years. She becomes the new chancellor of Starfleet Academy and also commands the Starship Athena, which doubles as classroom space for the cadets.

Robert Picardo is back as the Emergency Medical Hologram Doctor (originally from “Star Trek: Voyager”).

We also see a couple returning Discovery characters. There’s Engineer Jett Reno, played by Tig Notaro, who’s now a physics instructor. And also Admiral Charles Vance, played by Oded Fehr.

The great Paul Giamatti plays the evil alien, Nus Braka, in the premiere. 

Confusing Syllabus
Is “Starfleet Academy” any good? Well… that depends how you approach this series.

It’s sweet at its best with lots of warm and golden imagery to support the optimistic vibe. It’s easy to watch. Feels good. And there are endless “Star Trek” references and easter eggs for core Trekkies.

At its worst, it’s downright silly and even bland.

It plays more like “Lower Decks” or “Prodigy,” where most of the humorous focus is on our younger and untested characters. (We even get to see a direct reference to one of the Prodigy characters from that sadly cancelled series.)

As a result, I’m not really sure who this new series is for.

It’s kind of funny. Sometimes serious. A bit preachy. Often predictable.

Slick Campus Brochure
We’re almost constantly presented with cool Trek references… The background is filled with them… from different species you can spot to famous names on buildings (James T. Kirk Pavilion).

Okay, we get it. It’s “Star Trek.”

But is this good science fiction?

Well, not yet… not after the first two episodes, which simply introduce our new characters and show the cadets settling into their college campus. Sure, there’s some obligatory fighting and a space battle in the premiere episode, but we’ve seen it all before.

Easy Classes Won’t be Challenging
The show looks great, and the production values are high, but that’s not going to be enough to carry this first season.

As I mentioned, this new Trek is somewhat bland. It’s certainly not disruptive, the way “Discovery” season 1 was. It’s not really a successor to “Discovery” either, other than supporting character crossovers. It’s not classic Trek. “Strange New Worlds” carries that torch. As I mentioned, it plays more like “Lower Decks,” but not as intentionally funny.

That said, in an early scene, a nervous cadet reports to the Doctor that she thinks she swallowed her ‘combadge.’ (What?) I think that’s supposed to be funny. But it also tears away at the foundations of our Trek universe. 

This is Starfleet Academy! I know recruitment standards are down (as this is the first class in a while) but come on!

Mixed Feelings After Orientation
Sandro Rosta is strong enough as our conflicted main cadet character, but he hardly carries the series. Hopefully, he’s given more to do than search for his long-lost mother. 

Holly Hunter certainly breaks the mold for your typical Federation captain. Her Captain Ake is more of a hippy professor who likes to walk around in bare feet. She prefers to scrunch into her captain’s chair, feet tucked in.

Okay. So, Ake is not traditionally tough, like Janeway or Kirk. She’s more caring. And clearly a parental figure for Caleb. Not to jump between genres here, but she’s kind of our Dumbledore. And as I think about it, it’s not a terrible jump to loosely compare this Trek structurally to Harry Potter.

It’s great to see Robert Picardo again reprise his EMH role (as he did in “Prodigy”), and he fits in exceptionally well here.

I also like Ake’s tough Number One… Cadet Master Lura Thock, played by Gina Yashere. (She’s half Klingon, half Jem’Hadar.)

Paul Giamatti adds badly needed dramatic energy to the first episode, though he’s underutilized. Hopefully his future scenes are not simply him screaming and chewing the scenery. 

Clearly, there are some strong elements in this young series, but the overall result is hardly ‘compelling.’ I don’t feel like rushing to the next episode.

Unfocused Class Schedule
So, where does this leave us?

No, “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” isn’t the disaster as many reviewers would have you believe. But yes, it’s launch is certainly uneven.

Some have called it “Star Trek: 90210.” Of course, I see that. Lots of teen drama here.

I say it’s a “Star Trek” casserole. Fragments from “Discovery.” A dash of “Voyager.” Comedy from “Lower Decks.” And even humpback whales (clearly descendants from “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home”).

But how “Starfleet Academy” truly defines itself as a unique property has yet to be seen.

Alumni Support Still Goes a Long Way
Showrunner Alex Kurtzman has apparently created this for the next generation, but I’m not sure they’re going to show up. As for existing Trekkies, there’s not enough strong science fiction storytelling yet.

All this said, here’s the reason why I’m going to keep watching:

Though flawed and uneven, this young series retains the core optimism and positive energy of “Star Trek.” In fact, it exudes it! 

Lots of sci-fi shows these days are dark, confusing and project depressing alternate realities. Sure, those main characters may make it through an episode, but just barely. It can leave you feeling really drained.

Alternately, “Starfleet Academy’s” lighter tone has left me feeling more upbeat. And as I typically stream my shows after dinner, it’s a better recipe for a good night’s sleep.

They’d Better Ace the Mid Term
Sure, it’s still silly. Predictable. Bland.

But it’s still “Star Trek.” And that counts for something.

I haven’t written off “Starfleet Academy” after just two episodes, and you shouldn’t either.

But these first two episodes get a C+ grade from me at best. So, it’s time to turn it around, please.

The semester is underway, and the clock is ticking.