At Home with Tech

Unlock the power of all your technology and learn how to master your photography, computers and smartphone.

Category: Uncategorized

Here’s How I Finally Wrapped My 9th Grade Film Thanks to AI Video Generation

These are the AI characters I created to star in the big scene from “The Portal in Central Park,” originally written by me and a few friends decades ago and finally brought to life through Google’s Veo 3’s AI superpowers. Here’s how I did it.

When I was in 9th grade, I joined a school project with some friends. We were going to shoot a science fiction mini movie around Central Park in New York City. We wrote part of our time travel script, discussed the many logistics and locations we’d shoot in. 

Young Filmmakers on the Streets of New York?
I remember we were going to feature a tall, black obelisk that at the time was found at the entrance to Central Park on 59th Street and 5th Avenue. The sculpture would be the ‘time portal’ that our characters would walk towards and disappear through. Clever editing would avoid the need for special effects.

We were in ‘preproduction’ that spring, and it would have been a spectacular time to film on the streets of New York. Though we were all inspired by the potential of our little project, most eventually realized the many complexities of making a movie and how long it really would take to pull it off. Still, I felt undeterred. But the others had a different (more realistic) view.

Our project started losing steam, and ultimately, our short flick never got out of development. It was simply too big a lift. A few months later, we all graduated, and that was it.

My Origin Story that Never Happened
This would have been my origin story as a fifteen-year-old filmmaker, but it was not to be. (Instead, a year later, I found a more structured opportunity to explore my video production interests in high school.) 

But I’ve never forgotten about my first student movie short that never was. That obelisk scene is seared into my long-term memory. I really wanted to capture that shot. I saw it so clearly.

I still do.

AI Video Generation Can Bring Your Vision to Life
Over the decades, I’ve occasionally found myself returning to the nagging sadness that we never finished our movie. Heck, we never started it!

But if I could somehow go back to the future and capture that obelisk scene, maybe I could check it off my bucket list.

Well, now I can… from the comfort of my home office with a little text-to-video prompting and the power of AI video generation.

Yes, the magic of Gen AI is transforming our existence on a daily basis. And yes, it can now enable me to finally manifest my dusty vision out of thin air. 

So that’s exactly what I decided to do. 

There are multiple platforms that are up to the task. I decided to use Google’s Veo 3.1 and Flow/Scenebuilder. So, I signed up for the Google AI Pro plan for twenty bucks a month. I felt that would give me enough generative AI credits for what would be a 30-second scene.Text to Image Prompting
First, I created still images of my three main characters using Google Whisk and its text-to-image generation powers:

The Leader

Second in Command

The Nerd

Text to Video Prompting in Scenebuilder
Any remnants of our original script were long gone, but as I’ve said, the obelisk imagery remained clearly in my mind.

I’ve admittedly updated the characters (away from a few school kids) and added a few lines (current scriptwriter’s prerogative). Yes, these AI characters can talk!

Then, I uploaded the images of my AI actors and began typing in prompts for individual shots around this one scene. I relied on the ‘Scenebuilder’ mode to retain the same characters and background from shot to shot.

Veo 3.1 is impressive, but it also hallucinated a fair amount, adding in new scripted lines, a few of which I end up using. 

“The Portal in Central Park,” My AI-Generated Movie Scene
And here’s my completed 30-second scene, “The Portal in Central Park”… finally ready for its premiere all these decades later.

Imperfect, Yet Simultaneously Stunning
Okay. This is not exactly going to win any awards, and it does look rather fake (Though not entirely fake… It could easily serve as an early draft for a pitch to do a real shoot).

And I also found myself struggling to get precisely what I wanted. (Perhaps that’s due to the limitations in my basic text prompting skills.) Strangely, I felt like a director arguing with live actors who didn’t want to follow my direction.

As I mentioned, I ended up accepting the actors’ improv in a couple of the hallucinations. So, this scene isn’t exactly what I originally envisioned, but it’s close.

The background music is also AI-generated through Google’s MusicFX platform. I just typed in… “A cinematic feeling piece of music suggesting that time is running out. Exciting violins. Medium tempo.”

Click. One try is all it took.

That’s a Wrap!
Ultimately, I found it amazing what I was able to accomplish in just a few hours. That said, I edited the clips together manually in Final Cut Pro. This part still required (for now) nuanced timing and a human touch.

Each clip took about a minute to generate using Veo 3.1 Fast mode. And yes, there were many that ended up on the cutting room floor. 

But as imperfect as the results were, I can still say I successfully brought my teenage cinematic vision ‘to life.’

The Future of Visual Storytelling
But I must admit there’s more to this exercise than completing the big scene from an old school project that I’m sure my former classmates have long forgotten about.

The truth is I’m back to where I started as a teenager. I still feel the creative passion to bring stories to life, but I again need to learn how to use the tools available to me.

And that’s exactly what I’m doing.

For twenty bucks, you and I can conjure up complete videos with stories and characters based on simple text prompts. It feels entirely like a fantasy. But it’s not. 

The only part of the process that feels normal is this: 

-The power of the written word is as strong as ever.

Keep It Real
We’re clearly in the middle of a creative revolution. If you want to keep up, there’s no time to lose.

Learn how to use these new AI-fueled creative tools, which will continue to improve… There are countless reasons why.

…Or else you may find yourself eventually becoming the hallucination on the cutting room floor.

Why Would Anyone Make the Next “Tron” Movie without Tron?

“Tron” is the odd science fiction movie franchise that spans 43 years with decades between installments. That’s certainly a hard way to build momentum. The third film, “Tron: Ares” comes out in theaters on October 10th.

The first two, “Tron” (1982) and “Tron: Legacy” (2010) weren’t especially successful, though they offered cutting-edge visual effects for their time. The original “Tron” hasn’t aged well at all, but the analog execution of a digital civilization inside a computer video game was still remarkable. “Tron: Legacy” stretched the technology limits from those days to “de-age” Jeff Bridges in parts of the movie.

“Tron: Legacy” was the Sequel We Wanted
I really enjoyed “Tron: Legacy.” Though it didn’t quite stick the landing, it got most everything else right. This wicked-cool sequel successfully continued its own core storyline almost three decades later and brought in new, engaging characters. The movie was fun, and the visual effects, other than the de-aging tech, were slick.

But it didn’t make enough money at the box office. So though “Tron: Legacy” ended with something of a cliffhanger, Disney never made the next film. I was disappointed.

I thought that was it for “Tron.” But never say never.

“Tron: Ares” is Not the Sequel I was Hoping For
And then seemingly under the radar and without much fanfare other than the normal prerelease marketing hype, this third “Tron” movie got made. Fifteen years later, we have another “Tron” ready for release. 

It’s apparently a soft reboot for this franchise. And that makes sense at one level. Who else other than a science fiction geek like me will remember its predecessor that’s as old as my teenage son?

In the trailers for this new film, the premise is flipped. Instead of going into the “Grid” of the computer universe, the digital characters and machines are released into our world. And they’re not friendly. Mayhem ensues.

Okay…

Truthfully, I’m not feeling that excited.

How Can You Have “Tron” without Tron?
Where’s Tron, the character played by Bruce Boxleitner in the first two movies?

Where’s Jeff Bridges’ Kevin Flynn? He does show up (surprisingly) in the trailer. So, there’s a connective thread. But it looks pretty thin. Sadly, the other characters from “Tron: Legacy” are all absent.

The trailers tell us that “Tron: Ares” centers around Ares, an AI program in humanoid form played by Jared Leto. And he has questions. 

He says, “I’m looking for something. Something I do not understand.” That’s pretty vague. 

Will he destroy the world? Will he save it? The trailer suggests he’s the good guy. Maybe he’s the new Tron?  (I don’t think so.)

The plot seemingly leans into the topic of AI. But weren’t all “Tron” characters (‘Programs’) always AI-enabled?

Good Characters Matter More than Special Effects
I don’t know if “Tron: Ares” is a good film. I do know the trailers are not compelling. And that’s usually not a positive sign for a movie (but not always).

Strong science fiction flicks are always character driven. Sure, the special effects are important, but they’re never enough to carry a film. And besides, the special effects displayed in the “Tron: Ares” trailers only feel like incremental updates to “Tron: Legacy.”

Maybe the producers feel nobody will remember. So why not rinse and repeat?

That’s fine, as long as there’s a stated story that will draw the audience. And interesting characters. Unfortunately, the trailers just focus on the special effects and pounding music.

Is Being Tron-Adjacent Enough?
Yes, I’m disappointed that this “Tron” will be mostly ‘Tron-less.’ At best, it will be ‘Tron-adjacent.’ 

Sure, one could praise this effort to narratively break from the mothership and forge ahead in a different direction, but still in the same universe. But I can’t help feel a sense of loss that so much has been jettisoned from the core of this franchise.

No, I shouldn’t prejudge “Tron: Ares.” I should watch it first and then offer an informed opinion. And I intend to (even if the reviews are scathing).

And of course, this type of movie is best seen on the big screen (IMAX). There are so few films being released in theaters these days. So, why not?

But as we approach the release of this new “Tron” flick, this ‘User’ wants to feel more excited. 

Game over? Well see…

Why Did “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” Stumble at the Box Office?

My son and I went out to the movies to see “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” shortly after the box office turned against it. (Ticket sales plunged 67% during its second weekend in the theaters.) What looked like a big hit was proving to be just a moderate success. It received great reviews. So, what went wrong?

After the post-credit scene, my son looked at me and asked if I liked the movie. I half-heartedly said, “Yes.” He agreed in a similar tone. Clearly, neither of us were enthusiastic. I think we both wanted to enjoy the movie more than we did. (He eventually admitted he liked “Thunderbolts*” much more.)

Not that I’m an ‘official’ movie reviewer (although if you know me, I’ve been chasing that dream since I was in college), but I think I know what’s going on here.

The Alternate Reality of Earth-828
If you’re a Marvel fan, then you’re hoping for a hit, just like me. (It’s been something of a dry spell.) We all wanted “The Fantastic Four” to succeed.

And there’s a lot to like about it. It’s fresh. It’s different. It’s retro futuristic.

But while the 1960s design choice is visually appealing, it also creates an energetic void that limits the movie.

Our main characters are effectively stuck in a type of “WandaVision” faux reality. The movie is so intent on setting up its alternate universe for this Earth-828, it takes up more screen time than it should. We even get to see fictional Saturday morning “Fantastic Four” cartoons, as if this cements the connection.

We get it. 

Blast Off to Yesterday’s Tomorrow
This movie works hard to remind us of a ‘better,’ more optimistic and wholesome time in our history. And this nostalgic hook does have some payoffs.

For me, one of the best moments comes during the rocket launch sequence. As we get a beautiful Apollo-type liftoff, complete with rousing music (by Michael Giacchino), we can spot “United States” etched in the ship’s frame and perfectly positioned in the shot.

Yes, I felt a little jolt of adrenaline as the cool ship ascended from its hip New York City launch pad.

Many parts of this movie are designed with a bright, optimistic feel. And to a certain extent, it works.

Family Friendly
Directed by Matt Shakman, “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” looks fantastic. But it plays too much like an after-school TV special.

The overall theme is about ‘family’ (though it’s actually more about parenting). There’s a layer of connection and warmth that permeates through the entire film. (Even the spectacle of our heroes’ superpowers is more of an afterthought for much of the movie.)

But that also takes the edge off… just about everything. (Sure, the world may end, but gosh darn it, we’re all going to stick together, right?)

I feel the best scenes occur off world where we’re not reminded of the ‘good-old-days’ era of Earth-828. Deep in the cosmos, our characters are finally allowed to react more authentically to the dangers that confront them.

Where’s the Conflict?
Said another way, there’s just not enough tension in this story. Our Fantastic Four family barely argues. Pedro Pascal’s Reed Richards just worries a lot. Joseph Quinn’s Johnny Storm is way too nice for his brash character. Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s ‘Thing’ is so polite and sweet, you just want to squeeze him. Even the evil Silver Surfer played by Julia Garner (minor spoiler alert) has a soft spot.

Fortunately, Vanessa Kirby’s Sue Storm powers the movie’s major themes. The story orbits her struggles. 

This is really a movie about motherhood and doing anything for your children. And it’s beautiful. The movie’s high points all surround Sue Storm.

But I’m not sure this is enough to be at the center of a Marvel movie.

Too Charming to be Believable
A family of superheroes without disfunction is a different formula, and it’s not one that’s powered Marvel’s biggest hits.

Our favorite Marvel characters are flawed. They’re often funny. Sometimes inappropriate.

Chris Evans’ Captain America was the obvious exception. But his character was always a fish out of water, and that was the storytelling strategy. And it worked.

These Fantastic Four are pretty-darned perfect and live on an easy-breezy Earth-828 with analog tech from the 1960s that can somehow power a spaceship faster than the speed of light.

It’s simply fantastic (and skews dangerously close to fantasy).

It’s just not realistic. I know this is science fiction, but good storytelling needs to be grounded in a reality you can believe in and relate to.

Moms, Assemble!
I think parents (especially mothers) will connect most to this movie. And those old enough to remember the good vibes of the ‘60s.

And that’s simply not Marvel’s core target audience. For my 15-year-old’s generation, this movie must be culturally confusing. It doesn’t really feel like a Marvel movie. 

To be a blockbuster, “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” needs to connect with just about everyone.

First Steps was Bound to Stumble
“The Fantastic Four: First Steps” is not a bad movie. It’s good. Just not fantastic.

And in an era of declining box office returns and growing fatigue with mediocre Marvel films, it’s no surprise “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” underperformed.

Silver Lining
Here’s the good news: If you’re generally not a big Marvel movie fan, because there’s too much violence, or you’ve lost track of the extended storyline that links all the films together, then this is the perfect Marvel flick for you.

It’s a standalone story in its own corner of the multiverse and doesn’t even deserve its PG-13 rating (maybe it’s a bit intense here and there).

“The Fantastic Four: First Steps” is a solid summer movie for someone who doesn’t like the typical sci-fi blockbuster.

The 1960s Never Looked So Good
The movie’s earnest energy and gee-wiz sense of wonder may not totally wow everyone, but Earth-828 in the MCU is still swell and groovy.

Still, I prefer our much messier Earth-616.