At Home with Tech

Unlock the power of all your technology and learn how to master your photography, computers and smartphone.

Tag: Trekkie

Why Can’t Today’s “Star Trek” Give Us What We Want?

There are numerous theories why “Star Trek” has had a bumpy ride during these past years. While on the one hand, Paramount+ has given us multiple new series, they were often uneven (“Discovery” and “Picard”). Plus, the best ones were cancelled too soon. (“Lower Decks” and “Strange New Worlds.”)

And then there’s the problem with the movies… or lack of them.

Kelvin Timeline Abandoned

We waited ten long years for the fourth Kelvin timeline movie… only to have it recently cancelled after so many false starts. (The Kelvin timeline was a clever ‘alternate reality’ version of the “Star Trek” universe, which allowed the producers creative license to make certain narrative changes in this Kirk-era prequel.) 

I remember reading that the problem was the huge price tag vs. the expected box office. 

The writers would have had Chris Hemsworth come back as Kirk’s father. But Thor was too expensive (not to mention all the other actors).

That would have been a wonderful way to wrap this version of “Star Trek.” And I expect many of the other proposed scripts had potential as well. But the producers clearly couldn’t make it work. 

A New Ship with Nowhere to Go

So, Chris Pine’s Kirk and crew won’t get their final voyage together on their new ship that was constructed at the end of 2016’s “Star Trek: Beyond.”

Sure, I’ve read there’s now a completely new movie reboot in the works. And that’s fine (if it actually happens).

But that doesn’t change the fact that Trekkies waited a decade for the movie they wanted… and then never got. 

“Star Trek” on Paramount+

Instead, we’ve seen a “Star Trek” renaissance explode on television via Paramount+ since 2017. And that’s not so bad, right?

But this great streaming run is seemingly ending. “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” has wrapped filming its truncated fifth and final season. 

And the new “Starfleet Academy” has had a rough first season. They’ve already shot the second season, but the series hasn’t been picked up beyond that.

A lot of fans (myself included) are angry that we never got the spin-off series “Star Trek: Legacy” after “Picard.” With Seven of Nine (Jeri Ryan) helming the new Enterprise-G, that series would have been spectacular. It would be the perfect bridge between the old and the new.

Instead, we got a show about some cadets in Starfleet Academy that nobody asked for.

Kurtzman Trek

It really shouldn’t be that hard to read the room when it comes to satisfying the core fan base.

I certainly understand that the recipe for “Star Trek’s” ongoing success must include bringing in new fans. And that means evolving the franchise.

I know that many Trekkies have been piling blame onto Alex Kurtzman lately. He’s the showrunner behind all the recent Star Trek series on Paramount+. And he’s clearly been tweaking the “Star Trek” formula.

There’s nothing wrong with updating the “Star Trek” universe. But I would say the core elements of great science fiction storytelling must always apply.

No, not every Trek episode has to be perfect, but with so few episodes being created for each season (10), there’s not much room for misfires.

Grading “Starfleet Academy’s” Freshman Year

“Starfleet Academy” has launched to a slow start. Happily, it’s been picking up steam. Episode 9 is the best yet. 

It’s directed by Jonathan Frakes with a more exciting plot that gets out of the classroom and tests the rigor of our cadets. Plus, we get to see Captain Ake, played by Holly Hunter finally act a little more like a strong starship leader.

Still, you might say a good 9th episode is a little late in the semester.

I think the problem with “Starfleet Academy” is that it’s trying so hard to be fresh, it doesn’t feel enough like “Star Trek.” It’s too loose and too often silly.

Sure, it gives us the Doctor from “Star Trek: Voyager” and a couple characters from “Discovery” as anchors. But that’s not enough.

This series has some real work to do, but I’m not sure how you course correct when your second season is already in the can.

“I Don’t Believe in a No-Win Scenario”

I’ve read that some fans are complaining about the politics of “Starfleet Academy.” I don’t think that’s the problem. Being a Trekkie has always required being open to inclusive ideas. That’s the point of “Star Trek.” For 60 years.

Not to oversimplify, but I think this all comes down to the basics. We need to focus more on better storytelling. Better character development. Better science fiction. 

And please just give the core fans more of what we want.

Then, I think more of everyone will show up.

I hope it’s not too late.

Why I Haven’t Immediately Given “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” a Failing Grade

I can’t think of another moment in “Star Trek” history with such low expectations about an upcoming series as with “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy.” Perhaps because nobody asked for this. I was certainly not interested in the stories of a few unknown cadets roughing it during their first semester at Starfleet Academy. There are so many other seemingly better directions to go with “Star Trek.”

But the state of Trek these days is complicated. 

  • “Discovery” – cancelled
  • “Lower Decks” – cancelled
  • “Prodigy” – cancelled
  • “Strange New Worlds” – to be cancelled after its fifth season
  • The fourth Kelvin timeline movie that we’ve been patiently waiting for over the past decade – cancelled

For many, including me, the obvious next step would have been to greenlight a spinoff series from “Star Trek: Picard.” It was perfectly set up in the last scene with Seven of Nine as the captain of the rechristened Enterprise-G. 

The great cast was already in place with Jeri Ryan front and center. There was even a name: “Star Trek: Legacy.”

But no.

The State of Kurtzman Trek
Alex Kurtzman has been at the helm of these newer series on Paramount+, and while I’m pleased that “Star Trek” returned to television with an explosion of content over these past nine years, that streaming spigot has now clearly been severely restricted.

Of course, it’s all about money. (Isn’t it always?)

So where is “Star Trek” going? Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future. 
(Sorry…. mixing up my sci-fi references.)

But first, let’s kick the tires on “Starfleet Academy,” now that the first two episodes have finally dropped. 

Registration is Open
As the title suggests, this series follows several young cadets and their adventures at Starfleet Academy. It’s during the same timeline as the later “Discovery” seasons after that ship jumped a whopping 900 years forward. These are the years when a fractured Federation is still rebuilding after “the Burn.” And this is the first Starfleet Academy class to be assembled in over a century.

Our main cadet character is Caleb Mir, played by Sandro Rosta. In the show’s first scene, we see that when he was a child, he is unfairly separated from his mother by the Federation. He’s been on the run ever since, searching for her.

Our new captain is Nahla Ake, played by Holly Hunter. She’s half-Lanthanite, giving her a life span of some hundreds of years. She becomes the new chancellor of Starfleet Academy and also commands the Starship Athena, which doubles as classroom space for the cadets.

Robert Picardo is back as the Emergency Medical Hologram Doctor (originally from “Star Trek: Voyager”).

We also see a couple returning Discovery characters. There’s Engineer Jett Reno, played by Tig Notaro, who’s now a physics instructor. And also Admiral Charles Vance, played by Oded Fehr.

The great Paul Giamatti plays the evil alien, Nus Braka, in the premiere. 

Confusing Syllabus
Is “Starfleet Academy” any good? Well… that depends how you approach this series.

It’s sweet at its best with lots of warm and golden imagery to support the optimistic vibe. It’s easy to watch. Feels good. And there are endless “Star Trek” references and easter eggs for core Trekkies.

At its worst, it’s downright silly and even bland.

It plays more like “Lower Decks” or “Prodigy,” where most of the humorous focus is on our younger and untested characters. (We even get to see a direct reference to one of the Prodigy characters from that sadly cancelled series.)

As a result, I’m not really sure who this new series is for.

It’s kind of funny. Sometimes serious. A bit preachy. Often predictable.

Slick Campus Brochure
We’re almost constantly presented with cool Trek references… The background is filled with them… from different species you can spot to famous names on buildings (James T. Kirk Pavilion).

Okay, we get it. It’s “Star Trek.”

But is this good science fiction?

Well, not yet… not after the first two episodes, which simply introduce our new characters and show the cadets settling into their college campus. Sure, there’s some obligatory fighting and a space battle in the premiere episode, but we’ve seen it all before.

Easy Classes Won’t be Challenging
The show looks great, and the production values are high, but that’s not going to be enough to carry this first season.

As I mentioned, this new Trek is somewhat bland. It’s certainly not disruptive, the way “Discovery” season 1 was. It’s not really a successor to “Discovery” either, other than supporting character crossovers. It’s not classic Trek. “Strange New Worlds” carries that torch. As I mentioned, it plays more like “Lower Decks,” but not as intentionally funny.

That said, in an early scene, a nervous cadet reports to the Doctor that she thinks she swallowed her ‘combadge.’ (What?) I think that’s supposed to be funny. But it also tears away at the foundations of our Trek universe. 

This is Starfleet Academy! I know recruitment standards are down (as this is the first class in a while) but come on!

Mixed Feelings After Orientation
Sandro Rosta is strong enough as our conflicted main cadet character, but he hardly carries the series. Hopefully, he’s given more to do than search for his long-lost mother. 

Holly Hunter certainly breaks the mold for your typical Federation captain. Her Captain Ake is more of a hippy professor who likes to walk around in bare feet. She prefers to scrunch into her captain’s chair, feet tucked in.

Okay. So, Ake is not traditionally tough, like Janeway or Kirk. She’s more caring. And clearly a parental figure for Caleb. Not to jump between genres here, but she’s kind of our Dumbledore. And as I think about it, it’s not a terrible jump to loosely compare this Trek structurally to Harry Potter.

It’s great to see Robert Picardo again reprise his EMH role (as he did in “Prodigy”), and he fits in exceptionally well here.

I also like Ake’s tough Number One… Cadet Master Lura Thock, played by Gina Yashere. (She’s half Klingon, half Jem’Hadar.)

Paul Giamatti adds badly needed dramatic energy to the first episode, though he’s underutilized. Hopefully his future scenes are not simply him screaming and chewing the scenery. 

Clearly, there are some strong elements in this young series, but the overall result is hardly ‘compelling.’ I don’t feel like rushing to the next episode.

Unfocused Class Schedule
So, where does this leave us?

No, “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” isn’t the disaster as many reviewers would have you believe. But yes, it’s launch is certainly uneven.

Some have called it “Star Trek: 90210.” Of course, I see that. Lots of teen drama here.

I say it’s a “Star Trek” casserole. Fragments from “Discovery.” A dash of “Voyager.” Comedy from “Lower Decks.” And even humpback whales (clearly descendants from “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home”).

But how “Starfleet Academy” truly defines itself as a unique property has yet to be seen.

Alumni Support Still Goes a Long Way
Showrunner Alex Kurtzman has apparently created this for the next generation, but I’m not sure they’re going to show up. As for existing Trekkies, there’s not enough strong science fiction storytelling yet.

All this said, here’s the reason why I’m going to keep watching:

Though flawed and uneven, this young series retains the core optimism and positive energy of “Star Trek.” In fact, it exudes it! 

Lots of sci-fi shows these days are dark, confusing and project depressing alternate realities. Sure, those main characters may make it through an episode, but just barely. It can leave you feeling really drained.

Alternately, “Starfleet Academy’s” lighter tone has left me feeling more upbeat. And as I typically stream my shows after dinner, it’s a better recipe for a good night’s sleep.

They’d Better Ace the Mid Term
Sure, it’s still silly. Predictable. Bland.

But it’s still “Star Trek.” And that counts for something.

I haven’t written off “Starfleet Academy” after just two episodes, and you shouldn’t either.

But these first two episodes get a C+ grade from me at best. So, it’s time to turn it around, please.

The semester is underway, and the clock is ticking.

Why Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Continues to Hit It

The crew of the Starship Enterprise is back! After what feels like a century-long break, season 3 of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” has finally arrived on Paramount+. I’m not sure why the producers waited so long (season 4 is already in production), but I couldn’t be happier.

Putting the Band Back Together

If you’ve been stuck somewhere in the Guardian of Forever, you may not know that “Strange New Worlds” is the Back to the Future of Star Trek. It chronicles the voyages of the Enterprise immediately before the saga of Captain Kirk and his crew. This crew is led by Captain Christopher Pike (played by Anson Mount), but we already know many of the characters. 

Ethan Peck is Spock. Celia Rose Gooding plays Nyota Uhura. Rebecca Romijn is Number One (originally seen in 1966’s “The Menagerie” episode). Jess Bush plays Christine Chapel, and Babs Olusanmokun is Dr. M’Benga (who was in two episodes of the original series).

There are also new characters on the bridge, including La’an Noonien-Singh (Christina Chong) and Erica Ortegas (Melissa Navia).

And some familiar characters have joined the series along the way: Martin Quinn as Scotty and Paul Wesley as Lt. James T. Kirk. 

Returning to the 23rd Century Never Felt So Cool
“Strange New Worlds” is inevitably bound by Star Trek canon but does a remarkable job not being incumbered by that limitation. In so many ways, the show embraces its roots. Sure, the writers (and designers) push the canon edges a bit, but not so much that a Trekkie would cry foul. 

Of course, the bridge of the Enterprise looks more high tech, but the same floor plan is still in place. Of course, the CGI shots of the ship look significantly different than the five analog shots we repeatedly saw during the original series. There must be a team of talented art directors for “Strange New Worlds” regularly declaring, “You think that shot of our NCC-1701 was cool? Well, take a look at this!” They’re clearly having way too much fun.

No Dystopian Future Here
And fun is the key ingredient that permeates throughout this entire prequel series. The writers have also given a lot of time to the ensemble cast, and the series is stronger for that reason.

“Strange New Worlds” shines by capturing the optimistic and entrepreneurial spirit of the original series. This success has also enabled the series to take a few really big creative swings. (I’ll leave it at that.)

Fate Fuels this Series
But this series is not without its serious side. Most significantly, this Captain Pike (minor spoiler) learns his unfortunate fate in the not-too-distant future, and season 1 deals with that theme.

Just as importantly, we know the future for many of these characters. And for the new ones who don’t show up later in the timeline… well that doesn’t necessarily bode well for them. (The series has already killed off one major character.)

There’s already a sense that time is beginning to run out before we get to the end of this beginning. (More on this later.)

Lt. James T. Kirk
But happily, we’re not there yet. The series is acutely self-aware of these variables and the writers have clearly embraced the challenge of how to maximize the impact of fate for this show. 

But that factor hasn’t limited the writers either. They’ve discovered and explored plenty of storytelling opportunities within the strict limitations of Trek canon. This has been most apparent with the re-introduction of Kirk. The original series makes no reference to Captain Kirk’s adventures with Pike, other than they knew each other. But that’s enough.

Season 3 Starts Strong Enough
As I write this, I’m four episodes into season 3. I can’t say I’ve been blown away by the scripts from a science fiction perspective. (Episode 3 was about zombies.) But the series’ existing strengths have sufficiently carried each episode.

Plus, if you’re a Trekkie, there have been some huge additional payoffs.

Season 3, Episode 2 – “Wedding Bell Blues”
This is a fun episode, if not a little silly (but also bittersweet). 

More significantly, the writers finally answer the question decades in the making whether Trelane (originally seen in 1967’s “The Squire of Gothos” episode and now played by Rhys Darby) is a confirmed Q.

Spoiler: He is.

Season 3, Episode 4 – “A Space Adventure Hour”
The plot is effectively a retread of holodeck episodes from “The Next Generation.” But it’s still an instant classic. The opening minutes are simply priceless. It’s a spoof on bad science fiction from the 60’s. And a parody on “Star Trek” itself. And stunningly, it takes a huge jab at William Shatner’s acting. Wesley effectively does his own Shatner impression. 

It’s wonderful without being mean-spirited. And this scene definitively answers a lingering fan question why “Strange New Worlds” Jim Kirk hasn’t tried harder to imitate Shatner’s Kirk.

This episode (directed by Jonathan Frakes) also cleverly offers its own commentary on the success and failure of the original “Star Trek.”

Fresh and Confident
“Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” is so self-aware. It needs to be. But it hasn’t had to tip toe as it travels uncomfortably close to own predecessor. (successor?) In fact, it charges through this space, both creatively and respectfully.

It knows this story is not about the end. It’s about the journey.

Only a Five-Year Mission
But as Paramount+ has announced that we’re only getting five seasons, I can’t help but feel the pressure that the end isn’t far away. This makes each remaining episode that much more important.

“Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” may not live long, but it certainly continues to prosper.

So, let’s “Hit it!”