Is It Time to Stockpile Light Bulbs?
How many Americans does it take to screw in a light bulb?
The 133 year-old answer used to be – 1.
And that was Thomas Edison.
Not any more.
Now, the number seems to be more like 4,815,162,342.
Edison was Wrong
Thanks to The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 signed by President Bush, incandescent bulbs aren’t cutting it anymore and need to get 25% more efficient or else. As we approach Earth Day you might say that’s a good thing.
The problem is the law creates a mandatory phase out of many incandescent bulbs, beginning with the 100-watt bulb this October. The kill dates for other bulbs all the way down to 40 watts continues through 2014.
Now, the targeted bulbs can get a reprieve if manufacturers can improve their efficiency numbers, so maybe there’s no cause for alarm.
As far as I’m concerned, this is all pretty complicated, and I’m feeling a bit in the dark on what’s really going on. I just want the lights to work.
I’m not yet ready to hoard light bulbs in preparation for the new green Dark Age to come, but I’m not glowing either.
The $10 million Light Bulb
One bright spot in this dim tale is the news that our government also wants light bulb manufacturers to innovate. Just fixing the old filament model isn’t enough.
Also in 2007, the DOE announced their $10 million Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize (L Prize) competition to spur the development of a 60 watt equivalent LED bulb with strict standards to replace incandescents.
Philips Lighting North America was the only entrant, and after much nail biting, (drum roll please) Philips took the prize last August with their new
L Prize LED bulb.
And this weekend, the wait for consumers to illuminate their bright and efficient future is over. The L Bulb goes on sale this Sunday at retailers like Home Depot.
You might want to be the first in line, because I bet there’s going to be a stampede to snap up this new bulb of the future.
It will sip only 10 watts, last for 20 years and offer a natural, dimmable light.
Plus, there’s no mercury in it like those icky compact fluorescent bulbs.
Don’t get me started on the promise of expensive CFLs and how burned I felt after I bought into all of that hype a decade ago. (Anyone else?)
And the price tag for the new darling L Bulb?
Cancel the trip to Home Depot.
I don’t care how efficient or how long lasting the bulb is.
How can $50 compete with your warm and cozy $1 incandescent?
Philips says discounts will bring prices down through sales via utility companies.
I’ll be patiently waiting.
Look, I totally understand that as a country we have to become more energy efficient.
Our old light bulb tech is bleeding energy. I get it.
So our government takes a tough stand for the greater good and eliminates a lot of standard light bulbs, as we know it.
You now need new tech to light your home or you’ll be breaking out that box of candles from your closet.
Then the government hosts a little $10 million contest. And only one player enters. And then the one winning entry costs $50.
Do you see a little problem here?
I’m just a little unsettled about how I’m going to be turning on the lights next year.
Waiting for the Light Bulb to Go Off in the DOE’s Head
The whole thing seems half-baked.
(Not that LED bulb tech isn’t cool. Wired Magazine did a great cover story on it last September.)
The timing of this tech sea change is simply too quick. Get us a bulb that can serve as an energy efficient replacement bulb that people will actually buy.
If Uncle Sam could put a man on the moon in the ‘60s, I think he can do a little more on Earth today to help keep the lights on at an affordable cost.
New tech is supposed to make your life easier. Not force you to go broke, because an update to a hundred year old technology isn’t ready for prime time.
Plus, there’s no argument here that says you can just “do without.”
This is not a nice-to-have item at home.
We’re talking about light so you can see at night.
Remember, that cool nineteenth century invention?
Aren’t you a little bit worried?
“How can $50 compete with your warm and cozy $1 incandescent?”
You must be terrible at math. If you have one or both of the following:
1. A lamp that is illuminated a significant portion of the date, and/or;
2. A lamp that is expensive to change because of labor costs to reach a bulb that is not easily accessible
You now have a case where a light bulb that last for years and uses much less electricity is the obvious choice even if the up-front purchase price seems high.