At Home with Tech

Unlock the power of all your technology and learn how to master your photography, computers and smartphone.

How to Give Your HDTV More HDMI Inputs

Regularly switching around the cables behind your aging HDTV because you don’t have enough HDMI inputs can be hazardous to your health… if you’re prone to lower back pain. Instead, it’s time to get more HDMI inputs with a multi-input switch!

Regularly switching around the cables behind your aging HDTV because you don’t have enough HDMI inputs can be hazardous to your health… if you’re prone to lower back pain. Instead, it’s time to get more HDMI inputs with a multi-input switch!

These days, my HDTV often sits quietly in my family room… like a lonely, dark monolith, aching to be found. The Big Game is the one moment each year that specifically reminds me there’s a big, hulking Guardian of Forever I should be visiting now and again.

Distant Man Cave
Once upon a time, I invested a great deal of time and energy setting up my own home theater. It was once a source of great pride that I had a respectable AV set up. But as more of my media consumption moments have become fragmented onto smaller, mobile platforms like my iPad and iPhone, I haven’t really focused lately on keeping my multimedia ‘shrine’ up to date.

The major exception is my recent addition of a new Apple TV to my old 42” Panasonic Plasma. As invigorating as that move was, I realized during my installation that I had unfortunately run out of available HDMI ports on my aging TV. So now, my tech toys have to compete for which ones get to stay on the island.

And that’s not so fun…

Buy an HDMI Switch
But short of purchasing a new TV, the only Franken-fix is really to buy some type of HDMI splitter or switcher.
(Also known as a switch)

The good news is I’m not alone with this problem. There are lots of HDTVs out there with insufficient HDMI inputs.
(Mine has only two.)

As a result, there’s a myriad of HDMI switch solutions available on the market to solve this problem.

The other problem is figuring out which one to get…

Convenience is Overrated
The pricing for an HDMI switch ranges from twenty bucks to a hundred dollars or more. It’s already a pretty mature market. So you should only pay for what you really need.

One major variable is how many inputs the switcher can handle. It’s typically from two to five, but you can easily find switches up to eight inputs.
(It just costs more.)

Many switches today have automatic sensors, which detect when one input is active verses another. Lots of folks out there run into problems with this feature especially with inputs that are always ‘on.’ As for me, I really don’t need this ‘intelligent’ detection. I’m just fine walking over and switching the switch manually.

The same goes for remote controls that come with many of these models. That’s just another remote I’m going to lose. Again, I don’t mind pressing a button on the main unit before I sit down.
(As much of a hardship as that apparently is for others…)

Passive is my Preference
The other major consideration is whether you’re going to get a powered unit with its own AC plug or a passive, unpowered unit that draws minimal power from the HDMI cable and its source.

I really like the idea of a passive switch without its own power supply, because I simply don’t want to plug in yet another power-sucking phantom device into my media center.

That said, there are reviewers out there saying that you should beware of passive switches, because they’re less likely to work out for you, depending on the specific AV source combinations you’re using.

Of course, others say you’ll be just fine with a passive unit.

I say take the chance to avoid having to plug in something else.
(And keep your receipt just in case.)

There are plenty of reasonably priced choices out there with decent reviews.
Here are three options…

KanexPro 3x1 Switcher

The Efficient Option

KanexPro 3×1 HDMI Switcher – $29.95
It can handle three inputs, which is one more than I need.
It’s a passively powered box with ultra-low power consumption that doesn’t require an external power supply.
(The designers thoughtfully allowed for a USB power option, if absolutely necessary…)

The KanexPro can also handle up to a 4K signal… not that I’m watching anything close to that today.

 

Comprehensive 2x1 Switcher

 

The Cheap Choice

Alternately, there’s the Comprehensive 2×1 HDMI Switcher – $19.95

It’s as bare bones as they come with only two inputs, and it essentially looks like a bulky splitter.

 

 

 

Kinivo 3x1 SwitcherThe Safe Zone  

If you still feel a little queasy with the idea of your AV sources not providing enough juice to run a passively powered switch, then I suggest buying a switch with its own plug is your way to go…

Kinivo makes a popular 3×1 powered switch (301BN) for $29.99 on Amazon.

This box has its own power cord and lots of blinking lights to tell you what’s going on.
(Overkill for me… but to each their own.)

Fully Functional
If you haven’t already guessed, I’m going with the KanexPro Switcher.

Click.

My home media center now is ready for Super Bowl Sunday…

Game on!

Like It or Not, You Need the Photos App to Share Your Pics

Adobe’s Lightroom is great… Until you realize it can’t do everything for you. Apple still holds the keys to using your shared photo albums in your iCloud account. If you don’t want to leave those behind, you’re going to need a Lightroom workaround to get your pics back into Apple’s Photos app…

Adobe’s Lightroom is great… Until you realize it can’t do everything for you. Apple still holds the keys to using your shared photo albums in your iCloud account. If you don’t want to leave those behind, you’re going to need a Lightroom workaround to get your pics back into Apple’s Photos app…

I was free! Free of Aperture, Apple’s expired photo-editing software. Last week, I successfully moved from Aperture to Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6. I passed on upgrading to Apple’s newer Photos app for OS X, because it isn’t as powerful as its predecessor. I felt I had no choice but to jump ship and go over to the enemy.

Lot’s of folks love Lightroom. Plus, I knew I was joining an established and healthy photo-management ecosystem.

It was a brand new day, and I looked for the sunrise…
But it never came. I had left the Apple universe, and the benefits it provides.

Suddenly, I realized…
How was I going to share my photos with my family and friends?
Holy frak…!

No More iCloud Shared Albums?
Sure, I was newly empowered to edit and manage my family photos using Adobe’s advanced and robust Lightroom.
(Though I’m still trying to figure out how to export my edited photo ‘versions’ out of Aperture with their creation dates intact)

But I quickly realized my photo-sharing process had been cut off. Adobe software doesn’t have access to iCloud where I used to effortlessly create my shared photo albums for the rest of my iPhone-carrying community. All that took was a simple drag and drop in Aperture.
(Remember, I’m currently choosing not to use Apple’s Photos app, which of course would easily do the trick.)

Sure, Lightroom can share photos directly with Facebook and Flickr. But I really didn’t want to pain my peeps to visit a new place to view my pics. That could get complicated for some, and I’d lose them…

iCloud sharing was already so simple…

Spanked!
Deep down, I always knew I’d be punished for using a product that was better than Apple’s. Punished for my lack of faith…

Apple, please take me back!
I know there’s got to be a way to find the path back to my iCloud account…

And in fact… there is.
But there’s a catch.
It’s going to take an extra ‘few’ steps.

How to Move Your Lightroom Photos into iCloud’s Shared Albums
Here’s the strategy for the workaround…

You’ve just got to export your photos from Lightroom to a place where one of your Apple devices can open and save them via the Photos iOS app. Once ingested into Photos, you can then immediately add your pics to your shared albums.

Because I’ve left behind my old iPhoto and Aperture programs, and since I’m not using the Photos app on my iMac, I can’t do any of this using my Mac. Instead, I need to export my Lightroom pics to my iPhone or iPad. And then they can take my photos to the finish line!

There are several ways to do that…

The easiest path for your photos to travel from an iMac to an iPhone/iPad is via AirDrop.

Alternately, you can export your photos from Lightroom to a different cloud account that your iPhone/iPad can also connect to. Then, you would save the photos and quickly add them to your photo streams.

For example, let’s use Dropbox:

  • Export your photos from Lightroom to your Dropbox folder on your Mac
  • Open your Dropbox app in your iPhone/iPad to see the photos
  • Save the photos to your iPhone/iPad
    (Which brings them back into the Apple ecosystem)
  • Open the Photos app on your iPhone/iPad and tap the share icon
  • Tap iCloud Photo Sharing
  • Choose your “Shared Album”
  • Tap “Post”

Let Me Count the Ways
Okay… so that takes eight steps to accomplish what used to take two.
Not exactly quick and easy.

That’s why it’s called a workaround.
…But it gets the job done.

And it’s somewhat ironic that as much as I’m shunning Photos for OSX, the iOS version is absolutely essentially to continue using my Apple shared albums.

There’s also some collateral damage… you ending up storing these shared photos locally on your iPhone/iPad as a result of the process. Sure, you can delete these pics later to free up some storage, but that takes even more steps!

I suppose the silver lining is you’ve got a complete local backup of some of your best photos to use if you don’t have cloud connectivity on your iPhone/iPad.

That isn’t so bad… is it?

It would be a whole lot easier if Adobe and Apple played better together.

One can dream…