At Home with Tech

Unlock the power of all your technology and learn how to master your photography, computers and smartphone.

Tag: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

Star Trek Finally Confronts the Fate of Benjamin Sisko from Deep Space Nine After 27 Years

Red Alert! “Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” attempts to answer the big question from “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’s” series finale. I was immediately concerned this would cause a rupture in the Trekkie space/time continuum.

“Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” has defied a ton of “Star Trek” norms in its freshman year. It’s often silly and sometimes cringy for anyone who considers themselves a Trekkie. The best I can say about this series is it feels “Star Trek” adjacent, but it dances very much to its own beat.

  • It’s Star Trek-lite
  • Star Trek-teen
  • Star Trek-after-school-special
  • Star Trek-Hogwarts
  • Perhaps, Star Trek-fun

Fine. That’s what it is. Take it or leave it. But please don’t break anything.

Did Sisko Die?
So when I realized episode 5 would tackle the big question about what happened to Captain Benjamin Sisko (played by Avery Brooks) from “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine” centuries back (and 27 years ago for us), I got worried. 

For those who don’t remember, (spoiler alert) in the series finale, Sisko either fell heroically to a fiery death or joined the Bajoran prophets in the celestial temple. 

Hey, “Starfleet Academy” has the right to reinvent “Star Trek” if it wants. But don’t you dare mess with “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine” (1993-1999), which is arguably the best Star Trek series of them all. 

Stop!!
It’s a risky idea at best, and yet the writers of the young “Starfleet Academy” decide to boldly confront “Deep Space Nine’s” cliffhanger. 

As the episode begins, I felt this huge impulse to somehow leap across space/time and stop it from happening. No. No. No! You’re going to create a warp core breach!

This series has yet to demonstrate the capability to responsibly handle this delicate topic, which is sealed in Trek canon. This is serious “Star Trek” stuff, and “Starfleet Academy” has been anything but serious.

Stop!!
It’s a risky idea at best, and yet the writers of the young “Starfleet Academy” decide to boldly confront “Deep Space Nine’s” cliffhanger. 

As the episode begins, I felt this huge impulse to somehow leap across space/time and stop it from happening. No. No. No! 

You’re going to create a warp core breach!

This series has yet to demonstrate the capability to responsibly handle this delicate topic, which is sealed in Trek canon. This is serious “Star Trek” stuff, and “Starfleet Academy” has been anything but serious.

Good Writing Matters
This episode benefits from two writers with deep “Star Trek” experience, and it shows.

“Series Acclimation Mil” is written by Kirsten Beyer and Tawny Newsome (who also has an important role in this episode). On a side note, you’ll remember Newsome as the voice of Ensign Mariner from the animated “Lower Decks.” She also appears in that great crossover episode from “Strange New Worlds.”

Our New Data?
The story focuses on SAM, the alien AI-photonic, played by Kerrice Brooks. She’s got plenty of problems and struggles as the emissary from her home world. So of course, she finds common ground when she comes across the old story of Captain and Emissary Sisko. 

So, SAM decides she wants to solve the unsolvable Sisko mystery. On paper, that may sound like a disastrous plot that would likely upset most Trekkies. But the writers demonstrate a serious respect for the challenge. And they successfully work through it using this unlikeliest of cadet characters. 

It’s impressive that SAM, who has so far been a silly, two-dimensional character totally carries this episode. It’s due to the writing as well as some strong directing and acting. Who knew that SAM, who seems inspired by Mork from Ork, would break through like this and become our new Spock or Data?

Classic Trek Storytelling
SAM gets to ask the classic Star Trek question, “What does it mean to be human?” Or this case… an ‘organic.’

As a photonic, SAM is not traditionally ‘real.’ Her mission to understand humanity, and her impossible search for Sisko, ultimately supports her own journey of self-discovery.

Yup. Classic Trek.

Jake Sisko is the Key
Then, the episode successfully tethers itself to the world of “Deep Space Nine” by reintroducing us all these years later to Jake Sisko, Captain Sisko’s son.

Now, we see an adult Jake Sisko (in hologram form) who is again played by Cirroc Lofton. And this series crossover provides the important weight this episode needs.

His presence gives the necessary permission to revisit this closed chapter in “Star Trek” history.

There are Always Possibilities
We all know that “Star Trek” is at its best when it presents us with challenging questions without all the answers. And that’s what we get here.

Don’t worry. We know the fate of Benjamin Sisko is unanswerable. That’s how the writers set it up 27 years ago, and Beyer and Newsome respect the boundaries. But that doesn’t mean they don’t offer up some clever and satisfying surprises.

Ultimately, this episode is a worthy love letter to “Deep Space Nine.” And I highly recommend it.

That said, one good episode does not yet make for a strong “Star Trek” series. But it does extend my hope that “Starfleet Academy” will eventually find its warp drive.

Please make it so.

Star Trek: Discovery Has Dropped the F-Bomb

I’m sure Kirk and Spock would be a bit more than a tad surprised if they heard some of the bad language coming out of the latest “Trek” iteration.

“Star Trek” has always been about breaking down barriers.

Remember that ‘first’ interracial kiss between Kirk and Uhura in the 1968 “Star Trek” episode “Plato’s Stepchildren?” And the “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine” kiss between two women (Dax and Lenara) from 1995’s “Rejoined” episode.

Now, “Star Trek: Discovery” has one of those barrier-breaking scenes that Trekkies will talk about for generations to come. It’s from the “Choose Your Pain” episode.

No, there’s no kiss in this fifth episode of the young series, but we see Lt. Stamets and Dr. Culber brushing their teeth together in their quarters and articulating some clearly intimate feelings. We have our first openly gay crew members. It’s a gentle and charming scene in a show that’s bombarded with harsh uncertainty. It’s well written and another important “Star Trek” moment that supports and builds on its universe of inclusion.

Bravo.

That, in itself distinguishes this episode as one to remember.
And it’s all I should be writing about.
(Other than we are introduced to a young Harry Mudd.)

But unfortunately, that’s not all that differentiates it.

Star Trek and the Four-Letter Word
In what actually felt pretty awkward to me, the writers also decided to throw some bad language into the script.

Variants of the four-letter ‘F’ and ‘S’ words, to be precise.

What???
(I had read this would be coming, but dropping the F-bomb still felt a little shocking.)

Look, I know that “Discovery” is a more gritty and edgy series, and there’s clearly a lot of violence.
So, what’s the problem with a few four-letter words?

We’ll, first off… it just seemed gratuitous. It didn’t feel any more significant except to inform viewers that the universal translator for this “Trek” doesn’t restrict *uck and *hit.

There are no CBS broadcast censors to worry about here.
(Hurray?)

So, I guess anything goes.
I feel it was clearly a message more than anything else.

Message received.

Daddy, What’s that Word Mean?
Suddenly, “Star Trek: Discovery” just became off limits to some younger viewers who aren’t allowed to consume R-rated content.

How inclusive is that?

Are the producers so desperate to distinguish their pay TV niche to attract only adults who enjoy their “Game of Thrones?”

I get the value proposition that if you’re going to pay for your “Star Trek,” the producers have got to give viewers more than what’s available on broadcast television.

But R-rated profanity? Really??

What’s interesting is the writers waited until the fifth episode to sprinkle in the three words at issue.

Hmmm… Actually, how bold is that?
If there’s going to be bad language here…. it should be present… front and center from the beginning of the series.

The Orville Surges Ahead
Speaking of trying to boldly go where no one has gone before, “Discovery” has another challenge to deal with. It continues to be scooped by the spoof over at Fox.

“The Orville” established its own onboard male couple (Bortus and Klyden) in its second episode. Sure, it’s a little different, because there are no females in their alien species.
(Well, not exactly)

And I’ve got to give some kudos to this “Star Trek” wannabe, which is rocking with some big-time guest stars – Liam Neeson and Charlize Theron.

I’m also really tickled how Seth MacFarlane is weaving in references (or boldly borrowing) story elements from some science fiction I grew up with… like “The Starlost” TV series from 1973 with Keir Dullea and 1989’s “Millennium” movie with Cheryl Ladd and Kris Kristofferson.

All of this is to say that “The Orville” in all of its silliness is showing lots of promise.

For Adults Only?
“Star Trek: Discovery” has promise too.

On a lark, I decided to take a look again at the first episode of “Star Trek: The Next Generation”
(CBS All Access gives you instant access to all “Trek” episodes.)

Whoa!!
Those first awkward minutes from “Encounter at Farpoint” have not aged well at all. We Trekkies really gave that series a lot of leeway until it found its footing.

But it was a series that everyone could watch.

All I’m saying here is I hope “Discovery” doesn’t continue too far down its path of targeting adult viewers only.

A Child of Star Trek
There has always been a younger generation of fans who were inspired by each version of “Star Trek.”

I was among the first wave, and honestly, I can’t imagine being told by my parents that I couldn’t watch “Star Trek,” because it wasn’t appropriate for kids.

Now, it’s true you can make the argument that “Discovery” is already too violent for children, but you wouldn’t find universal agreement on that point.

But you just can’t get around the F-bomb.

Right?

Retain the Universe of Inclusion
I just don’t think “Discovery” viewers need the naughty language.
(One Trekkie’s opinion)

That particular barrier doesn’t have to be broken.
It will just put up another one for younger viewers.

Message to “Discovery” writers:
Please clean up your potty mouth!