If you’re looking to purchase a new point-and-shoot camera, you should consider upgrading to a premium compact camera. You’ll be able to snap superior pictures and successfully battle photo blur, but it’s going to cost you…
You might be wondering why anyone would want to spend an ungodly amount of money on a newfangled compact camera that can fit in your pocket? Haven’t those kinds of cameras been around forever for a couple of hundred bucks? Plus, can’t your smartphone already take care of all your photo-snapping needs?
Well, not quite…
For me, the challenge is still how to capture a great moment in low light without a flash. That eternal blur is killing me. Unless, I’m shooting a bowl of fruit, any kind of motion creates some amount of blur!
I just want to be able to generate a crisp shot!
But for that, I’m going to need a bigger camera sensor. And I want it in a small camera.
Exactly…
The ‘Better’ Pocket Camera
They’re called ‘premium compact cameras.’
And they belong to a relatively new category of camera that’s supposed to solve the blur problem by using a much larger 1 inch-type sensor that’s typically built into larger and better DSLR cameras.
This upgrade provides a massive improvement over all other compact cameras that use smaller sensors.
If you think that ‘premium’ means it’s going to cost you more, it certainly will…
You may recall I recently destroyed my old Canon S100 pocket camera while performing an especially silly and pretty dangerous parenting maneuver. Since then, I’ve been on the market for a replacement camera. I questioned whether another standard point and shoot would really be that much better than the camera on my old iPhone 6 Plus. Not to mention the more advanced camera(s) on the iPhone 7.
(By the way, I think I’m going to wait to upgrade to the 8.)
And here’s the major reason for the creation of the premium compact camera market. Why else would anyone shell out anything for a pocket camera unless that camera could knock the socks off your smartphone?
And with that ‘promise’ in front of me, I decided to shell out some big dough in search of a little more clarity.
How to Decide…
There are essentially three choices to consider:
- Sony DSC-RX100 V
This is the fifth generation of the camera that launched the premium compact camera market. By most accounts, it’s still the one to beat.
Among its superior features, it’s the only one of the three to have a separate pop-up viewfinder in addition to its LCD screen.
The problem is it costs a thousand bucks!
(You can save some money by buying an earlier model… The III and IV are still on the market and are solid choices.)
- Canon G7X Mark II
At $700, the Canon is a little easier on the wallet. But the jump from what I’m used to spending is still startling.
The G7X II also has lots of fans out there. So I wouldn’t go wrong remaining in the Canon orbit.
The one big drawback is it doesn’t offer 4K video like the other two.
(More on this later.)
On the plus side, it has a longer 24-100mm zoom lens than the other two.
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10
This one will also set you back seven hundred bucks, but it has a slightly brighter lens. (F1.4-2.8 24-72mm equivalent) Every little bit helps when you’re fighting the blur in low light.
(But you only get the F1.4 boost when you’re framing at 24mm. I really like the 24mm wider angle when trying to handle group selfies.)
The Panasonic also has 4K-video capability. (As does the Sony)
But the LX10 can create MP4 video files in addition to AVCHD unlike the Sony, which can only generate AVCHD.
(I prefer editing with MP4 files in Final Cut Pro X.)
The LX10 has a cool ‘4K Photo-Burst’ mode, which gives you the option to generate a specific jpeg from a short MP4 clip that’s captured at 30fps.
Process of Elimination
You’ll find tons of camera reviews out there comparing these options. And you’ll probably spend hours (days) trying to digest it all. (I certainly did!)
I don’t think you can really go wrong with any of these three amigos. But each has its own advantages. There’s no perfect choice.
(Is there ever?)
For me the decision comes down to this…
As much as I don’t feel the need to start shooting my family videos in 4K right now, (1080 is just fine, that you very much.) I want to future-proof this camera as much as possible. iPhones already shoot in 4K. I don’t think it’s going to be that long until 1080 HD video becomes yesterday’s dated 720 HD format.
As much as I’ve been a Canon guy for over a decade, I have to make the difficult decision to walk away from the G7X II, because it lacks 4K.
And I just can’t bring myself to spending a thousand smackers on a pocket camera. That means I can’t go with the Sony.
So that leaves the Panasonic…
Though the process of elimination does lead me here, I don’t feel I’m going with a runner up. The LX10 gets its own great reviews.
(And by the way, I don’t mind that it doesn’t have a separate viewfinder. I never have the time to frame like that. I’m lucky if I can pull the camera out of my pocket and point it at a family moment before that moment has moved on!)
Click.
Hello, Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10!
Consider Yesterday’s Model
So I set myself back $700. And I’m not done yet.
(More on that in a moment.)
But before you take the same financial plunge, you should remember you’ve always got a fourth choice…
If you buy an older camera model, you’ll certainly save some money…
(Newer versions seem to get cranked out every year.)
The popular Sony RX100 III is selling for $698 at B&H Photo. That erases my Sony price premium concern. But it doesn’t have 4K video capabilities.
Amazon’s got the original Canon G7X for a hundred bucks less than the G7X II.
But I figure if I’m ready to spend $600 on a camera, then it’s worth ponying up a little more to get the latest and greatest.
As for the Panasonic LX10, there’s no earlier model that enough of an apples to apples comparison.
Should You Buy the Insurance?
I decided to purchase my Lumix LX10 online at B&H for $697.99.
As I looked at B&H’s check-out screen, there was the option to pick up an insurance plan through SquareTrade. (3-years of Drops and Spills for $128.99)
I quickly dismissed it, as I’m not a big believer of insurance for tech gear, except for my Apple products. My curser hovered over the camera-purchase button, but I just couldn’t press it…
What was wrong?
My subconscious was communicating with my conscious self…
It reminded me that I’ve broken more than one camera since becoming a daddy. The odds weren’t good that this one could go through the next few years totally unscathed.
Why wouldn’t I protect this camera, as I’m sure to be putting it in harms way?
I’m spending a boatload on this camera! It’s not going to be a throwaway item the first time it needs a repair. So why wouldn’t I buy the insurance?
Okay… enough said.
Hello, SquareTrade!
Accessorize!
Remember when I said I wasn’t done spending money…?
Well, there are a couple of important accessories to consider…
- Soft Pouch
I’ve got to protect my new precious. It just can’t bang around with all of my spare change in my pocket.
(What little is left!)
A stretchy, soft pouch will do the trick. The question is which one?
(There are dozens out there.)
So I called up B&H and asked the sales guy. He pointed me to this:
OP/TECH USA Digital D Soft Pouch – $17.95 at B&H.
Done.
- Extra Rechargeable Camera Battery
I always like to carry one with me. You never know…
It’s the Panasonic DMW-BLH7 – $39.95 at B&H.
- Battery Charger
Guess what? The LX10 doesn’t come with a separate battery charger.
Surprise!
You’re supposed to charge it in-camera using a supplied USB cable and AC charger.
While that felt like a game changer when I opened the box, after I sat with it for a bit, I realized it wasn’t such a big deal.
That said, I am getting that second battery. It would be nice to have a charger instead of always having to shuttle batteries in and out of the camera.
The B&H guy told me Panasonic hasn’t come out yet with its charger. But you can buy one from this manufacturer…
The Watson Compact ac/DC Charger Kit with Battery Adapter Plate for DMW-BLH7 is $19.95 at B&H.
It’s Not So… Small
And how pocketable is the LX10, really?
Well, it’s quite a bit bigger than my obliterated Canon S100. (R.I.P.)
But it’s smaller than my old Canon G9 (R.I.P.) …not as tall and thick.
Does the LX10 fit in my front pants pocket? Yeah…technically.
But honestly, it’s kind of tight.
I’ll make due…
(There’s no smaller camera with the same specs… especially a fast 24mm lens at the wide end.)
The Bottom Line
So I’ve got three takeaways to review as you consider your own decision:
#1
I love my new Panasonic Lumix LX10. It’s built like a tank, and my early photos look super!
#2
Yes, I’ve been suckered into buying into the world of 4K video to create my family videos.
(But I bet my future self will soon come back in time to thank me for this forward-thinking move.)
#3
If a camera costs a lot… go buy the insurance to protect it! You don’t have to feel good about the fact that you need it. (I still don’t.) Just do it. Trust me.
You can’t control your world. But now, you can certainly take better pictures of it. At some point along your photo-snapping journey through life, I expect you’ll decide it’s worth it to spend the extra money.
As my father likes to say, we go around once.
Get the nice camera…
A week ago, I returned from my trip to Davos, Switzerland. I snapped pictures with my new Panasonic DMC-LX10 ‘premium’ compact camera
The train ride from Zurich was a bit surreal.
Davos is a super cute town.
Some of the local residents don’t lean heavily on modern tech.
It was wicked cold.
I sampled some of the local cuisine. I made a point to have some Weiner Schnitzel and try the fondue. I really enjoyed muesli yogurt for breakfast.
The tiramisu rocked.
Some of the tech was kind of the same.
Other tech elements were expectedly different.
They still have smoking lounges?!
We passed by a closed bakery at 2am and spotted a mustached man in front of a wood-fired oven making bread for the next morning. He spotted us and sold us a hot loaf for three Swiss francs.
At Home with Tech 