At Home with Tech

Unlock the power of all your technology and learn how to master your photography, computers and smartphone.

Category: Tech in the News

Why Do You Need an iPhone with 512GB of Storage?

The world has somehow gotten along until now without an iPhone with 512GB of storage. Do you really need this much in your iPhone Xs? Here’s one opinion…

I’m sure I am one of countless Apple fans trying to figure out which iPhone to buy now that the annual upgrades have been announced. And after some serious consideration, I think I’m going to pull the trigger on the massive iPhone Xs Max.

Why?

Well, I’ve simply become accustomed to the larger screen of my old iPhone 6 Plus. I’ve got to say that I love my old ‘phablet.’ So, sticker shock aside, I know I’d be totally comfortable handling an Xs Max throughout my day. The big question is whether I really need to max out on the whopping 512GB of storage, which balloons the price tag to $1,449.

The 256GB option already doubles the current capacity of my 6 Plus.
Is it necessary to double it again?

To use all that up, you’d have to maintain a boatload of Hollywood movies on your iPhone or shoot an insane number of home videos.

And it’s ironic that while all media today is supposed to be easily stored and instantly available on the cloud… larger local storage is still marketed as a premium feature.
(But we all know that network upload speeds can’t compete with the huge media file sizes that we’re creating.)

Media Management Still Required
I try to download my iPhone videos to my iMac for long-term storage and then delete many of them from my iPhone. So I haven’t really been facing an iPhone storage crunch lately. But I also haven’t been shooting videos like I’m holding a bottomless bottle of beer.

If there’s one thing to remember when considering a new technology purchase, it’s how you might use it into the future…
(Past experience is not necessarily an indicator of future needs.)

Okay… So, why 512GB?

The Downside of Shooting in 4K
I was talking with a work colleague about this question, and he reminded me that you can chew through a lot of memory if you’re shooting video in 4K.

Oh… right. 4K:

  • The format I pledged over a year ago that I would use to shoot all of my family videos with my Panasonic Lumix LX10
  • The format that was quickly becoming the new video standard
  • The format that would future proof all of my home media
    (Just like 720HD and 1080HD was supposed to do not that long ago.)
  • The format that creates gigantic files

Yes… I’m shooting in 4K… mostly.

I know 4K video capability isn’t new in iPhones, but for those who are jumping into a 4K workflow on an iPhone, it’s worth remembering the heavy lifting that’s ahead for you…
(And remember, you can’t just pop in a fresh memory card when your iPhone fills up!)

Prepare for Huge File Sizes
Here’s approximately what a minute of 4K video on an iPhone consumes:

  • At 24 fps- 135MB
  • At 30 fps- 170MB
  • At 60 fps- 400MB

If you’re like me and ‘committed’ to 4K video, on average you’ll probably be using up about 500 MB of memory every time you shoot a video clip at 60 fps (assuming a little more than a minute a pop).

So let’s do some simple math:

  • You’d get 900 clips from 450GB of memory in a 512GB iPhone
  • And 400 clips from 200GB of memory in a 256GB iPhone

That’s a ton of clips either way!
(Remember, you’ve got to leave some memory for a few movies, your photos and all your apps!)

So again… who really needs 512GB of storage?

How It Gets Worse
Well, if you’re shooting longer segments on your iPhone such as capturing a 30-minute music recital, the math paints a different story:

That’s 12GB for 30 minutes.
Twenty 30-minute ‘events’ will absorb 240GB and your 256GB iPhone would suddenly be maxed out.

It’s Never Enough
Here’s the harsh reality: No matter how much onboard memory you’ve got on an iPhone, you’ll eventually fill it up… It’s just a matter of time if you’re not exporting and then deleting some of your content from your iPhone.

Sure, having 512GB to play with will delay the problem, but eventually, you’ll want to capture that once-in-a-lifetime moment, and your phone will choke.

The Wisdom of 256GB
Yes, there’s a minimum amount of storage that you absolutely need to handle your day to day. 64GB should certainly cover that… But it might get tight really quickly, even if you’re somewhat conscientious about offloading your video clips.

So, Is 256GB the sweet spot if you’re expecting to shoot a healthy number of photos and video clips?

Probably.

My Surprising Turning Point
It’s costs $200 more to supersize to 512GB.
That’s a lot of money for something you may not need.
But it’s not that much more considering you’re already going to plunk down $1,249.

Hmmm….

Well, you’re sure getting the best price-per-GB with 512GB.

And as much as I don’t feel I need 512GB of storage, I know I’ve been known to say you can never have too much memory.

The Decision Crystalizes
So who really needs 512GB of storage?
Probably about 54 people worldwide.

Who feels better having 512GB to play with?

Me.

I can’t really defend my choice.
But I think that’s what I’m going to do.

And I know I’m not alone.

Excessive?
I could blame the whole 4K video revolution.
I could blame my inconsistent home media management practices.
I could blame ‘FONES.’ (Fear of Not Enough Storage)

I’m going all in on 512GB on my iPhone Xs Max, and one day I may still run out of memory on the darn thing.

But after you think about it for a while, (or write a blog post about it)
…you figure that 200 bucks more may be worth a little peace of mind for the next couple of years as the family videographer.

It’s one opinion…
…for your consideration if you’re in the market for a new iPhone.

Good luck with your decision!

Should Kids Watch Netflix’s New ‘Lost in Space’ Series?

I still have my toy ‘Robot’ from the original “Lost in Space.” So, you can imagine how excited I feel about Netflix reimagining the series. The big question I’ve tried to figure out is whether my second grader is old enough to watch it with me. If you’re a parent with similar concerns, here’s my take…

I’ve been searching for a family-friendly TV series to watch with my second grader. So when Netflix’s new “Lost in Space” series premiered, I rushed to check it out. Not only because I’m a sci-fi geek who wanted to see how the creators had reimagined this version, but because I was hoping that this could be the new show for me and my boy.

I quickly streamed the full 10-episode season on my own, and it’s the closest I’ve ever come to binge watching.
(Each episode’s cliffhanger certainly contributed.)

Here’s one parent’s point of view…

The New Robinson Family
For those who know the original “Lost in Space” (1965-1968), the basics of the story are mostly the same… The Robinsons are trying to get to Alpha Centauri on their trusty spaceship, the Jupiter 2. They want to start a new life on an off-world colony, because the Earth is becoming uninhabitable. And they run into a whole universe of trouble on their trip… beginning with crash landing on an alien planet.

 

 

 

 

The major characters have all been brought back with two evolutionary updates…

The mom – Maureen Robinson, played by Molly Parker is essentially the family leader, because the dad – John Robinson, played by Toby Stephens has been out of the picture for a while (more on this in a moment).

Dr. Smith is now a woman, played by Parker Posey. And her dishonest, delusional and rather creepy character is played much closer to how Jonathan Harris did it in the first few episodes of the original series.

Which is to say, Dr. Smith is not at all silly.

This is Not Your Father’s Silly “Lost In Space”
In fact, there’s nothing silly about this “Lost in Space.” Nothing at all like the campy style of the original. This one is quite serious as the journey unfolds.

It’s not as dramatic a reimagining as “Battlestar Gallactica,” but this show certainly reflects some of those influences. The good news is this “Lost in Space” has an optimistic view on its universe, however flawed it has been set up to be…

The better news is at its core… “Lost in Space” is good,-old-fashioned ‘wholesome’ adventure. It has lots of thrills and great special effects with a seemingly limitless number of challenges that this family Robinson must figure out to survive.
(It even retains the original’s upbeat music by John Williams.)

“Lost in Space” has Grown Up
As with any action-packed sci-fi series, these episodes are a little ‘intense.’ Is this PG-TV rated show too aggressive for your younger crowd? I think that depends on how comfortable they are with what they’ve already been exposed to…

My son has seen the original “Star Wars” movies, but not the more violent crop of recent Jedi flicks.

He’s happily watched the first three episodes of “Lost in Space” with me, and he’s eager for more. That said, he woke up recently in the middle of the night with a bad dream after consuming the scarier moments from episode 3.
(Spoiler alert: Icky alien eels invade the fuel tanks and the ship.)

The biggest problem I’ve found is the writers saw fit to throw some salty language into a few of the episodes. Language I would prefer my boy not repeat. The worst offending moment comes about 14 minutes into episode 9 inside a cave, where Penny, played by Mina Sundwall uses the ‘S’ word to punctuate a major plot point. It’s actually pretty funny and entirely in line with her character’s comic timing. But that’s not really family-friendly script writing.
(At least it wasn’t as gratuitous as when the writers of “Star Trek: Discovery” decided to drop the F-Bomb for no good reason.)

Danger, Will Robinson!
Fortunately, there’s not a lot of violence in this “Lost in Space,” though there is an ongoing threat of violence and a whole lot of peril. Each of the Robinson characters face huge gauntlets where they need to step up.

The one brief exception on the violence issue surrounds the ‘Robot,’ played by Brian Steele under all of that metal. I don’t want to give too much away, so I’ll just say this character has different origins than the original Robot. And just by looking at its menacing exoskeleton, you’ll get a sense of the ‘danger’ it may pose.

Let’s just say that the Robot struggles with its core programming. Its journey to ‘do the right thing’ is an easily digestible morality lesson for kids. And the original series’ character connection between Will Robinson, played by Maxwell Jenkins and the Robot is completely maintained here.

 

 

 

 

What 8 year old wouldn’t be interested in a story about an 11-year-old boy and his own robot?

Of course, my son was immediately drawn to the character of the Robot.

Your Contribution Towards Family-Friendly TV
The story arc of the Robot is in many ways the simplest for kids to handle. Much of the rest of the series deals with more complex ‘human’ issues that you may need to deconstruct and talk through with your kids.

First off, this Robinson family barely starts out as a functioning unit. John Robinson had been away for three years on assignment in the military and that separation had lead John and Maureen to the point of official separation. So they’ve got some marital difficulties to work through.

Be prepared to talk about Dr. Smith and why she’s entirely untrustworthy, even pathologic… though she sometimes puts on a good face.

All of the actors do a nice job making the Robinsons a likable family. You absolutely root for them… even Don West, played by Ignacio Serricchio who eventually becomes a permanent house guest. He pretends to be a selfish rogue, but of course he has a heart of gold.

But just so you know, there are other human characters roaming about who fall into much grayer categories (another opportunity to talk it through with your kids).

The writing uses a number of flashback scenes, (à la “Lost”). So you may need to call out that storytelling device a few times.

The Women on the Jupiter 2
I should also mention that this series is not just for ‘boys.’ In fact, In many ways, this show is more about the female characters. And they’re written with more complexity…

Maureen Robinson is the main hero, but she’s had to make some questionable decisions along the way. Dr. Smith is the villain, but everything she does isn’t entirely premeditated or self-serving… Or is it? The rivalry between Maureen and Dr. Smith is a compelling, ongoing plot element.

And Judy Robinson, played by Taylor Russell is the clever MacGyver of the family.

Simply said, the women of this Jupiter 2 can easily take care of themselves.

Do Your Homework
Do you need to watch the episodes first to make sure you know what your kids are in for?
I did. And it was a good choice for my family.

I recommend you check out the first 2 episodes on your own. You can make a good decision for your family from there.
(Just be on the lookout in episode 9 for that word so you can fast forward past it, as I’m planning on doing.)

This Geeky Dad and his Boy are Enjoying the Journey to Alpha Centauri
I think the best reason kids should watch this series is it demonstrates how nothing is impossible. Over and over again, the Robinsons figure it out and get it done. As a plot device, that can get a little tedious for some adults (not me), but it’s perfect for kids.

If you haven’t figured it out yet, I really like this new and gritty “Lost in Space.” And I predict my boy will continue to enjoy it.

There’s danger at every turn, but once your kids get the sense that the Robinsons are going to make it through, they’ll probably be able to sit back and enjoy the ride.

Of course, the last word uttered at the end of the final episode of season one is…
(I’m not giving anything away.)

“Danger.”

Ultimately, for me… the new “Lost in Space” hits the sweet spot for uplifting
sci-fi family TV watching.

What Went Wrong with Blade Runner 2049?

Sometimes you’ve got to experience a movie for yourself instead of just reading everyone else’s opinion. That said, here’s my take as to why “Blade Runner 2049” failed to succeed at the box office.

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away (Massachusetts)… I used to write the ‘occasional’ movie review. That was before social media gave the capability of influencing public opinion to most of the planet.

Then, my patterns of life shifted. Fast forward another few chapters, and BAM! I’m a parent. And then as you might expect, I found it something of a challenge to get to the movies during the first week when a particular flick came out.
(And sometimes during the first month!)

Those delays quickly stripped me of my ability to form a point of view on new movies.
(That said, I’m enjoying life’s other priorities.)

But of course, there are exceptions…

Coming Out of Retirement
A few weeks back… I watched in dismay from the sidelines as “Blade Runner 2049” went down in flames when it premiered at the box office.

To date, this 150-million-dollar flick hasn’t even made $90 million back yet at the U.S. box office after five weeks of wide release.

I wondered what went so wrong? This positively-reviewed sequel to the iconic 1982 “Blade Runner” seemed like it had blockbuster written all over it.

As a science fiction fan, I was bummed out… It just didn’t make any sense.

Then, when Warner Brothers decided to pull the film early from its theatrical run I made a point to catch it before it entirely disappeared.

I realized I had to have my own opinion on this one… however delayed it might be.
(Plus, I really wanted to experience it on the big screen.)

So, what did I think…?

Barrett’s Movie Review
Overall, I enjoyed “Blade Runner 2049.”
A lot.
It’s solid.

Directed by Denis Villeneuve, it’s definitely a ‘movie experience’ complete with rich visuals that extend the groundbreaking vision of the original.

Harrison Ford is super in his reprisal of the blade runner Deckard, now in retirement… and also missing. But this is really Ryan Gosling’s movie, and he rocks as a cool and steady replicant blade runner about to come unhinged.

If I were to oversimplify the plot of this sequel in one sentence… Gosling is in the middle of a mystery/conspiracy that eventually leads him to Ford.

The visuals. The oppressive music. The complexity of the story.
This is the way big movies are supposed to be like.
Right?

But yes… I also saw some problems.
Significant problems.

And it makes sense to me that these drawbacks kept people away.
(Unfortunately)

While this is not to be designed to be a standard movie review, I want to address what I believe kept “Blade Runner 2049” from really taking off…

The Length
It’s 164 minutes. With all of the movie trailers that get thrown at you before the main flick actually begins, you’ve got to commit almost three hours of your day to watch this.

That, by itself will keep busy folks away.

It’s Confusing
Yes, so was the original. And some of the confusing elements from the first one are intentionally retained here.
You’ve got to pay attention as the plot goes through its twists and turns.
But, honestly, I missed the rationale behind a couple of big moments.

The Pace
It’s slow. It’s moody. And it’s wonderful.
But I don’t know that many people have the attention span for that anymore.
Unfortunately, that’s not the way blockbusters are made.

It’s Best to be a Student of “Blade Runner”
While you don’t need to see “Blade Runner” first, it certainly helps to maximize your enjoyment of this one. If you know the differences between the original’s theatrical cut vs. the director’s cut, even better. The problem is that removes a huge swath of the movie-going population who weren’t even born yet when “Blade Runner” came out.

A Sequel 35 Years Later
So, when you talk about a sequel’s appeal being fueled by the original… again, much of the audience wouldn’t have this opportunity, unless they sought it out on DVD decades later.

The Music Gives It Away
To continue the theme of inside baseball, the music track joins the club. And apparently, if you pay close attention to the music, you’ll figure out major plot developments, because certain pieces of music mirror similar themes from the original at pivotal points.
(I missed this entirely.)

Thumbs Up Anyway
So, “Blade Runner 2049” isn’t perfect.
Or maybe it would be more perfect if you come really prepared to watch it.

Will it become a classic, like the original?
Hmmm… hard to say. “Blade Runner” created its groundbreaking world from scratch. This one has the advantage of building on that.

But the more I think about this movie, the better I feel about it… flaws and all. It’s ambitious and bold. It takes a lot of chances, the way many blockbusters don’t.

Perhaps the most important realization I’ve had is that “Blade Runner 2049” has stayed with me. It didn’t evaporate the way so many other lighter and inconsequential flicks have done right after watching.

That says a lot.

On a five-point scale… I‘d give it a solid four.
“Blade Runner 2049” is definitely worth seeing, and now I understand why it underperformed.

And there you have it… a few tardy insights on a flick that’s still worth the attention it never got…

Any other thoughts out there…?